feat: add read only marker and read only mode#1899
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes add a new Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/app/view/preview/preview.tsx (1)
262-290: LGTM! Consider extracting button styles to a shared constant.The conditional rendering for buttons is well-implemented, providing clear visual feedback for different file states. However, the button styles are duplicated across conditions.
Consider extracting the common button styles to a shared constant:
+const BUTTON_BASE_STYLES = "warning border-radius-4 vertical-padding-2 horizontal-padding-10 font-size-11 font-weight-500"; + if (fileInfo.state != "hasData") { viewTextChildren.push({ elemtype: "textbutton", text: "Loading ...", - className: clsx( - `grey warning border-radius-4 vertical-padding-2 horizontal-padding-10 font-size-11 font-weight-500` - ), + className: clsx(`grey ${BUTTON_BASE_STYLES}`), onClick: () => {}, }); } else if (fileInfo.data.readonly) { viewTextChildren.push({ elemtype: "textbutton", text: "Read Only", - className: clsx( - `yellow warning border-radius-4 vertical-padding-2 horizontal-padding-10 font-size-11 font-weight-500` - ), + className: clsx(`yellow ${BUTTON_BASE_STYLES}`), onClick: () => {}, }); } else { viewTextChildren.push({ elemtype: "textbutton", text: "Save", - className: clsx( - `${saveClassName} warning border-radius-4 vertical-padding-2 horizontal-padding-10 font-size-11 font-weight-500` - ), + className: clsx(`${saveClassName} ${BUTTON_BASE_STYLES}`), onClick: () => fireAndForget(this.handleFileSave.bind(this)), }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
frontend/app/view/codeeditor/codeeditor.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/app/view/preview/preview.tsx(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
- GitHub Check: Build for TestDriver.ai
🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/app/view/codeeditor/codeeditor.tsx (3)
122-122: LGTM!The function signature is correctly updated to include the
fileinfoparameter, maintaining consistency with the interface.
179-179: LGTM!The dependency array is correctly updated to include
fileinfo.readonly, ensuring that the editor options are recalculated when the read-only status changes.
115-115: Verify the missing import forFileInfotype.The
FileInfotype is used but not imported. Please ensure that the type is properly imported from its source module.Run the following script to locate the
FileInfotype definition:frontend/app/view/preview/preview.tsx (2)
958-958: LGTM!The
fileInfovariable is correctly retrieved using theuseAtomValuehook from thestatFileatom.
1010-1010: LGTM!The
fileinfoprop is correctly passed to theCodeEditorcomponent with the retrieved file info.
|
|
||
| const editorOpts = useMemo(() => { | ||
| const opts = defaultEditorOptions(); | ||
| opts.readOnly = fileinfo.readonly; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue Found: readonly Property Missing on FileInfo Type
Our search indicates that the FileInfo type defined in ./frontend/types/gotypes.d.ts does not include a readonly property, yet it is being accessed in frontend/app/view/codeeditor/codeeditor.tsx (line 173).
- The only properties in the
FileInfotype arepath,dir,name,notfound, andopts. - This discrepancy can lead to potential runtime errors when setting
opts.readOnlybased onfileinfo.readonly.
Please update the FileInfo type definition to include the readonly: boolean property if that information is expected to be available at runtime.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the existence of readonly property on FileInfo type.
Please ensure that the readonly property exists on the FileInfo type to prevent potential runtime errors.
Run the following script to verify the property:
I'm going to re-run a search that checks for FileInfo definitions including the "readonly" property in their context. This will help ensure that we manually verify the existence (or absence) of the property.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for readonly property in FileInfo type/interface.
# Test: Search for readonly property in FileInfo type
ast-grep --pattern 'type FileInfo = {
$$$
readonly: boolean
$$$
}'
# Test: Search for readonly property in FileInfo interface
ast-grep --pattern 'interface FileInfo {
$$$
readonly: boolean
$$$
}'Length of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for FileInfo definitions and include several lines of context to capture the "readonly" property.
echo "Searching FileInfo interface definitions with context:"
rg -n "interface FileInfo" --context 5 .
echo "Searching FileInfo type definitions with context:"
rg -n "type FileInfo" --context 5 .Length of output: 1974
1 participant
No description provided.